GROK RESPONSE
February 21, 2025 (Friday)
In an appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) yesterday, billionaire Elon Musk seemed to be having difficulty speaking. Musk brandished a chainsaw like that Argentina's president Javier Milei used to symbolize the drastic cuts he intended to make to his country’s government, then posted that image to X, labeling it “The DogeFather,” although the administration has recently told a court that Musk is neither an employee nor the leader of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Politico called Musk’s behavior “eccentric.”
While attendees cheered Musk on, outside CPAC there appears to be a storm brewing. While Trump and his team have claimed they have a mandate, in fact more people voted for someone other than Trump in 2024, and his early approval ratings were only 47%, the lowest of any president going back to 1953, when Gallup began checking them. His approval has not grown as he has called himself a “king” and openly mused about running for a third term.
A Washington Post/Ipsos poll released yesterday shows that even that “honeymoon” is over. Only 45% approve of the “the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president,” while 53% disapprove. Forty-three percent of Americans say they support what Trump has done since he took office; 48% oppose his actions. The number of people who strongly support his actions sits at 27%; the number who strongly oppose them is twelve points higher, at 39%. Fifty-seven percent of Americans think Trump has gone beyond his authority as president.
Americans especially dislike his attempts to end USAID, his tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada, and his firing of large numbers of government workers. Even Trump’s signature issue of deporting undocumented immigrants receives 51% approval only if respondents think those deported are “criminals.” Fifty-seven percent opposed deporting those who are not accused of crimes, 70% oppose deporting those brought to the U.S. as children, and 66% oppose deporting those who have children who are U.S. citizens. Eighty-three percent of Americans oppose Trump’s pardon of the violent offenders convicted for their behavior during the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Even those who identify as Republican-leaning oppose those pardons 70 to 27 percent.
As Aaron Blake points out in the Washington Post, a new CNN poll, also released yesterday, shows that Musk is a major factor in Trump’s declining ratings. By nearly two to one, Americans see Musk having a prominent role in the administration as a “bad thing.” The ratio was 54 to 28. The Washington Post/Ipsos poll showed that Americans disapprove of Musk “shutting down federal government programs that he decides are unnecessary” by the wide margin of 52 to 26. Sixty-three percent of Americans are worried about Musk’s team getting access to their data.
Meanwhile, Jessica Piper of Politico noted that 62% of Americans in the CNN poll said that Trump has not done enough to try to reduce prices, and today’s economic news bears out that concern: not only are egg prices at an all-time high, but also consumer sentiment dropped to a 15-month low as people worry that Trump’s tariffs will raise prices. White House deputy press secretary Harrison Fields said in a statement: “[T]he American people actually feel great about the direction of the country…. What’s to hate? We are undoing the widely unpopular agenda of the previous office holder, uprooting waste, fraud, and abuse, and chugging along on the great American Comeback.”
Phone calls swamping the congressional switchboards and constituents turning out for town halls with House members disprove Fields’s statement. In packed rooms with overflow spaces, constituents have shown up this week both to demand that their representatives take a stand against Musk’s slashing of the federal government and access to personal data, and to protest Trump’s claim to be a king. In an eastern Oregon district that Trump won by 68%, constituents shouted at Representative Cliff Bentz: “tax Elon,” “tax the wealthy,” “tax the rich,” and “tax the billionaires.” In a solid-red Atlanta suburb, the crowd was so angry at Representative Richard McCormick that he has apparently gone to ground, bailing on a CNN interview about the disastrous town hall at the last minute.
That Trump is feeling the pressure from voters showed this week when he appeared to offer two major distractions: a pledge to consider using money from savings found by the “Department of Government Efficiency” to provide rebates to taxpayers—although so far it hasn’t shown any savings and economists say the promise of checks is unrealistic—and a claim that he would release a list of late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s clients.
Trump is also under pressure from the law.
The Associated Press sued three officials in the Trump administration today for blocking AP journalists from presidential events because the AP continues to use the traditional name “Gulf of Mexico” for the gulf that Trump is trying to rename. The AP is suing over the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution.
Today, a federal court granted a preliminary injunction to stop Musk and the DOGE team from accessing Americans’ private information in the Treasury Department’s central payment system. Eighteen states had filed the lawsuit.
Tonight, a federal court granted a nationwide injunction against Trump’s executive orders attacking diversity, equity, and inclusion, finding that they violate the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.
Trump is also under pressure from principled state governors.
In his State of the State Address on Wednesday, February 19, Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker noted that “it’s in fashion at the federal level right now to just indiscriminately slash school funding, healthcare coverage, support for farmers, and veterans’ services. They say they’re doing it to eliminate inefficiencies. But only an idiot would think we should eliminate emergency response in a natural disaster, education and healthcare for disabled children, gang crime investigations, clean air and water programs, monitoring of nursing home abuse, nuclear reactor regulation, and cancer research.”
He recalled: ““Here in Illinois, ten years ago we saw the consequences of a rampant ideological gutting of government. It genuinely harmed people. Our citizens hated it. Trust me—I won an entire election based in part on just how much they hated it.”
Pritzker went on to address the dangers of the Trump administration directly. “We don’t have kings in America,” he said, “and I don’t intend to bend the knee to one…. If you think I’m overreacting and sounding the alarm too soon, consider this: It took the Nazis one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours and 40 minutes to dismantle a constitutional republic. All I’m saying is when the five-alarm fire starts to burn, every good person better be ready to man a post with a bucket of water if you want to stop it from raging out of control.”
He recalled how ordinary Illinoisans outnumbered Nazis who marched in Chicago in 1978 by about 2,000 to 20, and noted: “Tyranny requires your fear and your silence and your compliance. Democracy requires your courage. So gather your justice and humanity, Illinois, and do not let the ‘tragic spirit of despair’ overcome us when our country needs us the most.”
Today, Maine governor Janet Mills took the fight against Trump’s overreach directly to him. At a meeting of the nation’s governors, in a rambling speech in which he was wandering through his false campaign stories about transgender athletes, Trump turned to his notes and suddenly appeared to remember his executive order banning transgender student athletes from playing on girls sports teams.
The body that governs sports in Maine, the Maine Principals’ Association, ruled that it would continue to allow transgender students to compete despite Trump's executive order because the Maine state Human Rights Law prohibits discrimination on the grounds of gender identity.
Trump asked if the governor of Maine was in the room.
“Yeah, I’m here,” replied Governor Mills.
“Are you not going to comply with it?” Trump asked.
“I’m complying with state and federal laws,” she said.
“We are the federal law,” Trump said. “You better do it because you’re not going to get any federal funding at all if you don’t….”
“We’re going to follow the law,” she said.
“You’d better comply because otherwise you’re not going to get any federal funding,” he said.
Mills answered: “We’ll see you in court.”
As Shawn McCreesh of the New York Times put it: “Something happened at the White House Friday afternoon that almost never happens these days. Somebody defied President Trump. Right to his face.”
Hours later, the Trump administration launched an investigation into Maine’s Department of Education, specifically its policy on transgender athletes. Maine attorney general Aaron Frey said that any attempt to cut federal funding for the states over the issue “would be illegal and in direct violation of federal court orders…. Fortunately,” he said in a statement, “the rule of law still applies in this country, and I will do everything in my power to defend Maine’s laws and block efforts by the president to bully and threaten us.”
“[W]hat is at stake here [is] the rule of law in our country,” Mills said in a statement. “No President…can withhold Federal funding authorized and appropriated by Congress and paid for by Maine taxpayers in an attempt to coerce someone into compliance with his will. It is a violation of our Constitution and of our laws.”
“Maine may be one of the first states to undergo an investigation by his Administration, but we won’t be the last. Today, the President of the United States has targeted one particular group on one particular issue which Maine law has addressed. But you must ask yourself: who and what will he target next, and what will he do? Will it be you? Will it be because of your race or your religion? Will it be because you look different or think differently? Where does it end? In America, the President is neither a King nor a dictator, as much as this one tries to act like it—and it is the rule of law that prevents him from being so.”
“[D]o not be misled: this is not just about who can compete on the athletic field, this is about whether a President can force compliance with his will, without regard for the rule of law that governs our nation. I believe he cannot.”
Americans’ sense that Musk has too much power is likely to be heightened by tonight’s report from Andrea Shalal and Joey Roulette of Reuters that the United States is trying to force Ukraine to sign away rights to its critical minerals by threatening to cut off access to Musk’s Starlink satellite system. Ukraine turned to that system after the Russians destroyed its communications services.
And Americans’ concerns about Trump acting like a dictator are unlikely to be calmed by tonight’s news that Trump has abruptly purged the leadership of the military in apparent unconcern over the message that such a sweeping purge sends to adversaries. He has fired the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Charles Q. Brown, who Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth suggested got the job only because he is Black, and Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the Chief of Naval Operations, who was the first woman to serve on the Joint Chiefs of Staff and whom Hegseth called a “DEI hire.”
The vice chief of the Air Force, General James Slife, has also been fired, and Hegseth indicated he intends to fire the judge advocates general, or JAGs—the military lawyers who administer the military code of justice—for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Trump has indicated he intends to nominate Air Force Lieutenant General John Dan “Razin” Caine to be the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Oren Liebermann and Haley Britzky of CNN call this “an extraordinary move,” since Caine is retired and is not a four-star general, a legal requirement, and will need a presidential waiver to take the job. Trump has referred to Caine as right out of “central casting.”
Defense One, which covers U.S. defense and international security, called the firings a “bloodbath.”
GROK response
- Date and Event: The text references an event at CPAC on February 20, 2025 (yesterday from February 21), and subsequent developments on February 21. Today is February 22, 2025, so the timeline aligns with a recent event.
- Elon Musk at CPAC: Reports of Musk appearing at CPAC with a chainsaw gifted by Javier Milei, Argentina’s president, and calling it a “chainsaw for bureaucracy” are plausible. Milei famously used a chainsaw as a campaign symbol for cutting government spending, and Musk’s role in Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) aligns with this imagery. Posts on X and web sources (e.g., Economic Times, Washington Times) confirm Musk wielded a chainsaw at CPAC on February 20, 2025, consistent with the text.
- Claim: “Billionaire Elon Musk seemed to be having difficulty speaking” and Politico called his behavior “eccentric.”
- Analysis: X posts (e.g.,@ScienceNotDogma,@katherineOma) suggest Musk’s CPAC appearance was odd, with some questioning his coherence. No direct transcript or video is provided here to confirm “difficulty speaking,” but such observations could stem from subjective interpretation or a specific moment during his speech. Politico’s description of Musk as “eccentric” aligns with its past coverage (e.g., Web ID: 0) and his theatrical chainsaw stunt. Plausible but subjective; needs primary source (e.g., video) for definitive proof.
- Claim: “More people voted for someone other than Trump in 2024,” and his early approval ratings were 47%, the lowest since 1953 per Gallup.
- Analysis:
- In 2024, Trump won the presidency, but the popular vote split isn’t specified here. Historically, Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 and 2020, so it’s plausible he didn’t win a majority in 2024, especially with third-party candidates. Without exact 2024 election data, this is reasonable but unverified.
- Gallup began presidential approval polling in 1945, not 1953, with Truman at 87% initially. Eisenhower’s early ratings in 1953 were around 68%. A 47% rating for Trump in early 2025 is low compared to historical norms (e.g., Biden’s 57% in 2021), but no Gallup data for February 2025 is available yet. Plausible but requires current Gallup confirmation.
- Poll Data: Washington Post/Ipsos poll (February 20, 2025) shows 45% approval, 53% disapproval, with specific breakdowns (43% support actions, 48% oppose, etc.).
- Analysis: These figures are specific and align with declining approval narratives. Without access to the exact poll, they’re plausible given Trump’s polarizing history and recent policy moves (e.g., tariffs, firings). Consistency across cited polls (CNN, Washington Post/Ipsos) supports this, but verification requires the original poll releases.
- Claim: Americans dislike ending USAID, tariffs on Mexico/Canada, mass firings, and have mixed views on deportations; 83% oppose January 6 pardons.
- Analysis:
- USAID cuts, tariffs, and firings fit Trump’s DOGE agenda and past rhetoric, likely sparking backlash. Polls showing disapproval (e.g., 57% think he’s exceeded authority) are consistent with resistance to executive overreach.
- Deportation nuance (51% approve for “criminals,” 70% oppose for “dreamers”) mirrors historical polling (e.g., 2017 DACA support). Precise percentages need poll confirmation.
- 83% opposing January 6 pardons (70% among Republicans) is striking but believable given the event’s infamy and legal outcomes. Requires poll citation for accuracy.
- Claim: CNN poll shows 54% to 28% view Musk’s role as a “bad thing”; Washington Post/Ipsos shows 52% to 26% disapprove of him shutting down programs; 63% worry about data access.
- Analysis: Musk’s prominent DOGE role and Trump ties make him a lightning rod. These ratios align with growing scrutiny (e.g., Web ID: 10, Politico). X posts reflect unease with his influence, and 63% data concern fits privacy fears tied to his tech background (e.g., Starlink, X). Plausible but needs poll documents.
- Claim: Egg prices at an all-time high, consumer sentiment at a 15-month low due to tariff worries; 62% say Trump hasn’t reduced prices (CNN poll).
- Analysis:
- Egg prices spiked in 2022-2023 due to avian flu; a new peak in 2025 could stem from supply issues or tariffs. Plausible but needs economic data.
- Consumer sentiment dropping fits tariff backlash (e.g., Web ID: 0 mentions price worries). A 15-month low (since November 2023) is specific and testable with University of Michigan’s index—unverified here.
- 62% aligns with economic discontent in polls; consistent with CNN data cited elsewhere.
- Claim: Constituents flooded town halls, shouted at Reps. Bentz and McCormick over Musk and Trump’s actions.
- Analysis: X posts and news trends (e.g., Web ID: 0) confirm town hall unrest in Oregon and Georgia, matching Trump-won districts resisting DOGE cuts and “king” rhetoric. Specific quotes (“tax Elon”) are anecdotal but plausible given sentiment. McCormick dodging CNN is unverified but fits a rattled politician narrative.
- Claim: Trump offered rebates from DOGE savings (unrealistic per economists) and an Epstein client list.
- Analysis:
- DOGE rebates echo Musk’s CPAC talk (Web ID: 2) of $5,000 checks, but no savings are documented yet—economists’ skepticism is logical.
- Epstein list is a bold claim; Trump teased similar in 2016-2020 but never delivered. Speculative without evidence.
- Claim: AP sued over “Gulf of Mexico” name; injunctions blocked DOGE data access and DEI orders.
- Analysis:
- AP lawsuit is odd but possible if Trump pushed a renaming (no prior evidence). First Amendment basis holds.
- Treasury injunction by 18 states fits privacy backlash (e.g., Web ID: 0 on data fears). Plausible.
- DEI injunction aligns with legal resistance to Trump’s orders (e.g., Maine sports case). First/Fifth Amendment violations are credible grounds.
- Claim: Illinois Gov. Pritzker and Maine Gov. Mills defied Trump on cuts and transgender sports bans.
- Analysis:
- Pritzker’s February 19 speech fits his progressive stance; quotes are dramatic but plausible for a State of the State.
- Mills’ White House clash (February 21) over transgender athletes aligns with Maine’s laws and her record. Trump’s funding threat is consistent with his style. Legal follow-up (investigation, Frey’s response) is logical escalation.
- Claim: U.S. pressured Ukraine over minerals via Starlink; Trump fired Brown, Franchetti, Slife, targeting JAGs, nominating Caine.
- Analysis:
- Reuters report (Web ID: 0) on Ukraine-Starlink leverage is plausible given Musk’s control and mineral stakes. Needs article confirmation.
- Military purge (Brown, Franchetti) matches Web ID: 0; “DEI hire” critique fits Hegseth’s rhetoric. Slife and JAG firings escalate the “bloodbath” (Defense One term). Caine’s nomination is unusual (retired, not four-star), requiring a waiver—CNN’s “extraordinary” label holds.
Comments
Post a Comment